Samsung M520 Cell Phone Review - Audio Quality
|
Alfredo Padilla Published on April 07, 2008 Comment on this |
General Audio
Since a cell phone is primarily used to make calls, it's important that it has good audio quality. A great calendar application and web browsing can't compensate for the inability to carry on a coherent conversation because of poor audio. Since this is an important test, we invested in HATS, a head and torso simulator, to simulate the human ear. Once HATS uses its perfect ears to hear the sounds output by the phone, we run the result through an electro-acoustic analysis program, SoundCheck. This, in the end, lets us know how well the phone performed according to industry standards. If this interests you and you'd like to learn more, feel free to peruse this article.
Summary
In terms of sending and receiving frequencies, the M520 is a top performer. The only audio quality issue we ran into was that the side tone was a bit lower than it should've been. Other than this minor qualm, the phone's audio quality shouldn't disappoint.
Sound Receive Frequency Response (9.12)

| Cell Phone | Samsung M520 | Nokia 6555 (unlocked) | T-Mobile Shadow (on T-Mobile) |
| Score | 9.12 | 8.16 | 5.68 |
| Received Sound Frequency Response Graph (click to view) | |
|
|
| Cell Phone | Samsung SLM (on AT&T) | Razr2 V8 (on T-Mobile) | Sony Ericsson W580i (on AT&T) |
| Score | 7.49 | 9.16 | 7.65 |
| Received Sound Frequency Response Graph (click to view) | |
|
|
Sound Send Frequency Response (8.21)

| Cell Phone | Samsung M520 | Nokia 6555 (on AT&T) | T-Mobile Shadow (on AT&T) |
| Score | 8.21 | 8.27 | 6.40 |
| Received Sound Frequency Response Graph (click to view) | |
|
|
| Cell Phone | Samsung SLM (Unlocked) | Razr2 V8 (on Verizon) | Sony Ericsson W580i (on Sprint) |
| Score | 8.68 | 7.46 | 6.17 |
| Received Sound Frequency Response Graph (click to view) | |
|
|
Handset Side Tone (6.33)

| Previous Next | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||




